• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Method for controlling the power transmission of a transformer (3) to be switched via direct current (UB), the direct current voltage (UB) being provided by an inverter (2), and the inverter (2) alternating the primary coil of the transformer (3) supplied with three voltage states, namely positive voltage (UB), negative voltage (- UB) and zero voltage, each of these three voltages according to a pulse with a pulse duration applied to the primary coil, wherein at least one against a time (t) before gone Pulse durations one of the time (t) associated magnetization signal (m) is derived, which at least temporarily affects at least the instant (t) immediately following pulse duration in terms of an approximation of the magnetization in the transformer (3) to a symmetric magnetization.
    公开号:AT511298A1
    申请号:T4342011
    申请日:2011-03-28
    公开日:2012-10-15
    发明作者:Lutz Erhartt
    申请人:Lutz Erhartt；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    Dynamic PWM amplification for transformer-coupled push-pull inverters.
    Technical area:
    The invention relates to methods for controlling a Gleichstromumrichlers with AC intermediate circuit according to the principle of Durchflußwandlers consisting of an inverter with impressed DC voltage, a transformer and a rectifier, wherein the inverter, the three voltage states positive voltage (state plus), negative voltage (state minus) and voltage Zero (state zero) generates and puts an AC voltage to the transformer, the half-periods consist of a switch-on interval with positive or negative voltage (pulse) and a pause interval with the voltage zero, and a Schaltpcriodc consists of two half-cycles, according to the preamble of the claim 1.
    State of the art:
    Custom push-pull converters according to the preamble of claim 1 are Elalb- or full-bridge inverter. Advantageous compared to the forward converter are the full transformer utilization, as well as the low ripple of input and output current and a lower filter effort. The disadvantage is the risk of saturation of the transformer due to different lengths of positive and negative voltage pulses, which is why the scheme could only be done slowly.
    In order to exploit the advantages of push-pull converters, prior patents relate to methods that have compensated for different and, in particular, current-dependent switching delay curves of the circuit breakers. Modern power switches, e.g. FETs, IGBTs, have a virtually off-current off-delay time and almost no on-delay time, so at constant or known
    Inverter supply voltage alone can be closed from the control signals for the switching elements of an inverter to the magnetization state of the transformer, this procedure is in / 7 / AT 505507 Al, claim 6 protected.
    The new method and the new devices are functionally limited to pulse width modulated (PWM) inverters, different from a quasi-stationary control or symmetrization of the magnetizing current, as described in US Pat. No. 6,577,111, which is sufficient for a full-bridge (quasi) resonant converter the PWM control from the control signals for the performance age can not be concluded directly on the magnetization state of the transformer. US Pat. No. 6,577,111 shows the expense for detecting the magnetization current or the magnetic flux that can not be detected directly in the translonnator core. In the technical field of the subject invention, the measuring device for the magnetizing current can be replaced by a much cheaper observer.
    In the patent family / 2 / AT 505509 and DE 196 34 713 Al (same Uranmeldung or the same claim 1), a method is described which already large differences in the durations of successive positive and negative voltage pulses on the transformer by presetting the turn-on and their Averaging allowed. In this case, any flux shift is suppressed by presetting the switch-on or at least by presetting the switch-on and / or switch-off of a switching period. A detected change in the control value is fully satisfied with the first pulse in half and with the second pulse of the following switching period, so that the control speed is correct. a Vorvvärtswandlers operated with the same switching frequency is achieved, which generates only one voltage pulse per switching period.
    This will make the push-pull converter more dynamic, e.g. Arc shutdown or arc regulation. upgraded. For many applications, a current limitation is required, for reasons of operational safety. This can until now only be realized in the controller. In particular, due to the dangerous transformer short circuit, it is not yet possible to terminate the energy transfer at any time, as in the forward converter, e.g. as is the case with a pulse to pulse current limit. Because the magnetic flux is neither measured nor observed, the control is such that any flux shift is inhibited. If, during a switching period, the current exceeds a mostly adjustable value, even if the setpoint is instantaneously set to zero, the output of a minimum on-time, which may be up to one-half the maximum on-time, will occur to demagnetize the power transformer. In addition, there is another dead time because the setpoint is processed one switching period or two pulses long and not for each pulse. This can lead to unwanted and audible vibrations in current limiting operation.
    Furthermore, a method was protected in / 2 / and also in / 3 / EP 0898360 B1, according to which the averaging does not take place for a switching period but from pulse to pulse. In / 3 / is characteristically used a three-cornered auxiliary voltage for the pulse width modulator. Thereby, the dead time, which elapses from the time of possible execution until the Sollwcrtsprung is actually carried out, approximately halved, cs still remains a dead time due to the averaging and thus the accuracy of a current limit compared to the forward converter is reduced. Another dead time is added when the pulse duration is preset based on the previously sampled sample value and not currently determined. In the unlikely event that the spectrum of the control voltage over a longer period of time has high switching frequency frequency components, or these occur at shorter successive intervals, there is no saturation protection. During these periods, the suddenly occurring flux shift stops due to parasitic effects. If the switching-frequency disturbance disappears just as suddenly, the averaging causes the decayed flux shift to re-emerge, whereby the unfavorable case of the saturation short-circuit can occur. Also, in this way, multiple errors due to the decay of the flux shift due to parasitic effects may randomly add in the same direction. This is hitherto prevented by / 2 / if the setpoint is stored only every switching period. As a result, however, the dead time is introduced by a switching period and markedly reduced the accuracy of a current limit.
    In / 2 / and / 3 / EP 0898360 Bl turn-on time for positive and negative voltage pulses are generated, so that no flux shift - only in case of persistent switching frequency superimpositions on the control voltage would flow deflection unscattered - auffritt.
    The methods according to the invention require the storage of the observed magnetization and to this extent are digital solutions, such as / 2 / and / 3 /, which ensure that at least half the preceding pulse width is output. The importance of the digital solution lies in the obvious further procedure, which are described in / 4 / WO 00/23223 and / 51 WO 00/79675. Characteristic features are the digital PWM and / or pre-set or stored switching times or switch-on times.
    Also in / 6 / WO 2005/043738 the control and a Vollbrückenwcchsclrichtcr is described. Again, there is generally a default setting of the switching times or the Schaltzeitpunktc. The Mittclwertbildung is protected in claims 3, 4 and 5. In claim 3 is ..die Periodendaucr or frequency for Pulswcitcnmodulation ^ (control of the pulse width at a fixed switching frequency) "set to switch the Schaltclcmente the bridge inverter ...." In this way was already in the diploma Tuymer and Wenzelhuemer (Austrian Vorhaltungen to / 2 / AT 505509 A1) the averaging is realized. The mean value PWM described therein adjusts the phase shift between leading and trailing half-bridge switching of a full-bridge by increasing a switching period of a change-over switch. The intervention on the trailing switch causes the enlargement, the intervention on the leading switch the reduction of the phase shift. The reduction of switching losses in the switching elements of the inverter according to averaging is the subject of DA Tuymer. The (piecemeal) generation of a signal corresponding to the Transformatomagnetisierung, as is characteristic of the present claim 1, is not given in the procedure according to / 2 / - / 6 /.
    Unlike / 7 / AT 505507 A1, otherwise an additional patent would have been applied for, the amount of magnetic flux, hereinafter referred to as magnetization, is observed.
    In / 7 / a method is described, which can be realized very simply by means of analog circuit, control value and current limit signal are already processed as a forward converter. Furthermore, twice the positioning speed is achieved with respect to the forward converter, wherein flux displacements may occur. However, due to parasitic effects that cause the decay of a flux shift, deviations may occur over time between the observed magnetic flux trajectory and the magnetic flux actually occurring later in the transformer core by the inverter delay time. Taking this effect into account can be complex.
    There is a patent pending the method, according to which the decay of the flux shift is not imitated, but actively effected and controlled by changing the pulse widths and is controlled so that the transformer magnetization of the observed magnetization lags behind and cost can be limited. The transformer can be designed without an air gap, the magnetization requirement and thus the switch-off work of the inverters of the inverter η s "f f / r r r r rt v v v v v T T T T K K K K ^^ iau L vVCIiiwil.
    A simple device for observing the magnetization will be described.
    Iii the application was further described a device, which also river displacements during unlikely schaltffequenter overlays on the control value, which theoretically suddenly arise in the modification of the control voltage with a digital limit signal, stop and disappear, be discarded.
    Technical task:
    The present invention is based on the object, in a method of the type mentioned, to use the dynamic displacement induced flux displacement in the transformer with inexpensive means to improve the dynamic characteristics of the inverter, to further increase the safety by the energy transfer at any time, e.g. for the purpose of component protection or limitation of a process variable can be safely completed, and by even during sustained schaltfrcquenter overlays on the control voltage active symmetrization of the transformer 4-, takes place, and to lower the magnetization requirement of the transformer or to increase the efficiency.
    The partial solution of the problem consists in a first step in nachzusteuem the Transformatomiagnetisierung or the amount of magnetic flux in the transformer core during a pulse of a triangular auxiliary voltage for the pulse modulator, the presetting of a subsequent switching action (switching off and / or on a pulse) Thus, even with pulse shortening due to a further digital signal, it prevents a flux shift or is completely deactivated in the limiting operation.
    By means of the magnetization observer - a state-dependent absolute value integrator - and its symmetrization, the object of the invention is completely solved. The symmetrization of the observer causes the balancing of the transformer regardless of the switching frequency-determining auxiliary voltage of the pulse width modulator.
    The Symmetrienigscinrichtung compares the magnetization output from the Magnetisierungszähler in the pulse interval or with the amount that would occur in the symmetrical Belriebsfall and mixed for the generation of the following turn on the control value a corresponding deviation that can be adapted to special requirements, so that the Displacement is reduced.
    The continuous balancing of the transformer can be done without changing controller parameters, where the average of two pulse durations of a switching period can be the same as the control value (solar converter), or used to amplify control value changes, e.g. To achieve approximately the same dynamics in the welding process with different hose package lengths. It is a realization of averaging according to / 2 /, claim 6, described with a sawtooth auxiliary voltage, after which a flux shift is largely prevented, and it is a possibility according to the invention indicated abzusteuem approved flow displacements by weakening the control value change. Furthermore, the general calculation rule is given, according to which the control voltage can be superimposed in the switch-on times an almost arbitrary jump behavior. This opens up possibilities to regulate non-linear processes more dynamically and / or to relieve the controller and / or to influence the route behavior in a targeted manner.
    If the observed magnetization reaches a maximum value, the immediate pulse deactivation takes place. This signal is further used to detect switching frequency superpositions on the control voltage. If every second pulse (pulses of the same polarity) is terminated by the observer, there is a switching-frequency superimposition. As long as the Detektierungssequenz vorliegl, there is a continuous reduction of the
    Maximum magnetization until the Dedektierungssequenz is interrupted at the latest by the fact that the intervening pulse is terminated by reaching the reduced maximum magnetization and a symmetrical operating state is reached. The maximum magnetization is increased again if the Dedektierungssequenz is omitted or equal to the original value reset.
    The state of the art and the field of the invention are functional diagrams Fig.l and Fig.l la and time courses in Fig.2. The invention and the limiting operation are based on the time profiles in FIGS. 2, 4 and 6 explained. The method according to the invention is explained by means of the device circuits 3 and 5 and the signal flow diagrams 7 and 1 lb for PWM 10 in FIG. 1c, the device circuit diagram for the observer in FIG. 8, and with reference to the diagrams in FIG. 9 and FIG Results in Fig.l 2 summarized. s
    Show it:
    Fig. 1: a: Schematic diagram of a DC converter with mains rectifier.
    Voltage vector circuit, full bridge converter, transformer output rectifier and load, and controller and conventional or known pulse width modulator, b: functional content image for known pulse width modulator with three angular switching frequency determining auxiliary voltage, c: new control with further digital inputs for start / stop and / or limiting operation;
    Fig.2: Time courses in the limiting operation and resulting Flußverlagerung;
    Fig. 3: device circuit diagram of a pulse width modulator according to the invention with piecewise magnetization signal and input for limiting and start / stop operation;
    4: Zcitverläufe in the limiting operation, piecewise corresponding
    Magnetization signal, suppression of flux displacement according to further digital input:
    5 shows a device circuit diagram of a pulse width modulator according to the invention with piecewise generated magnetization signal and input for limiting operation;
    Fig.6: Time courses in the full limit operation, piecewise corresponding
    Magnetization signal, suppression of flux shift with
    Pulse omission;
    7 shows a signal flow diagram of a pulse width modulator according to the invention
    Observer and magnetization control or balancing device decoupled from switching frequency-determining auxiliary voltage (PWM) and further digital input;
    Fig.8: device diagram of the magnitude observer;
    9 shows a diagram for the cyclic process of the control of a flux displacement with one pulse;
    10: Diagram for the cyclic process of the control of a flux transfer with several pulses in two different ways;
    Fig. 11: a. Signal flow pattern for a PWM to / 2 / with sawtooth-shaped auxiliary voltage; b. Signal flow diagram of the control method according to the invention without continuous feedback of the magnetization to the balancing device;
    Fig. 12: control voltage jump responses of the inverter according to known and new method with different calculation rules.
    Fig.la shows the schematic diagram of a DC adjuster with
    AC intermediate circuit uw for the use of the control according to the invention or pulse pattern generation (10) for an inverter (2). Inverter (2) is typically supplied from the mains via Netzgleichrichtcr (6) on the input side of the operating voltage UB, which is smoothed by Kondensastor (1). The inverter output feeds the primary winding of transformer (3) with alternating positive or negative operating voltage and intervening interruptions of the energy transfer. V)
    The output rectifier (4) connected to the secondary winding of transformer (3) converts the transformed alternating voltage uw into the output voltage uA and supplies the load 5 connected via inductance 7.
    The control of the AC voltage uw takes place from Pulsmust er gencrator (11) via the signals on the lines (12,13) or (12) to (15). Inverter (2) may e.g. be executed as a full-bridge inverter with phase shift control. The control signals for the leading bridge branch, e.g. (11) and (12) determine the beginning and the control signals (13, 14) for the bridging bridge branch the end of each positive or negative voltage pulse to transformer (3). Pulse pattern generator 11 generates control signals for alternately positive and negative voltage pulses of uw from PWM signal z0 and provides the control signals with locking times, due to i.a. greater switch-off delay time of modern circuit breakers, which have almost no switch-on delay. Pulse pattern generator 11 is state of the art. The invention relates to pulse width modulator 10.
    Pulse pattern generator 11 is supplied with the digital PWM signal Zo by PWM 10 and converts each pulse of Zo into control pulses (12, 13) or (12-15) for a positive or negative voltage pulse of uw, with pulse pattern generator 11 of successive pulses of zq generates control signals for alternately positive and negative voltage pulses at the inverter output. The duration of successive pulses Zq correspond to the duration of consecutively alternating positive and negative voltage pulses uw. PWM signal z0 to state 0 means pulse pause, no energy transfer and storage of the transformer magnetization in the calibration path (uw = 0). The states 1 following pulse pauses (state 0) determine the pulse durations of the alternating positive and negative voltage pulses. According to this pattern, pulse pattern generator 11 of zq generates the drive signals in the trigger lines 12 and 13 or 12 to 15 for inverter 2. The generation of different pulse patterns for different inverters 2 does not concern the invention.
    The desired course of the DC output voltage uA pulse width modulator (10) by control voltage us on line (8) is predetermined, which is generated by controller 16. Regulator 16 receives emgangsseitig example. the setpoint uSot.u which is e.g. in impulse welding process changes abruptly. At regulator 16 output voltage uA and usually also output current iA are fed back. PWM 10 processes control voltage u $ to PWM signal zo, which is converted from conventional pulse pattern generator 11 to control signals 12, 13 or 12 to 15 for meanwhile common push-pull inverters.
    Due to the saturation problem, known control methods for PWM 10 are unable to terminate the power transfer (a voltage pulse Uw) at any time and to process a signal in this regard.
    Fig.lb shows a Eunktionsschaltbild for the known PWM 10 with averaging using a three corner Formi gene auxiliary voltage 23. Mixer 21 compares a modified with holding member 24 setpoint voltage usi with the triangular auxiliary voltage 23. Result 20 is from Zwi point 22 in PWM signal Zo transformed.
    The switching of the two-state element 22 from the logic state 0 to the logic state 1 (start of Einschaltzcit) takes place in the demagnetizing during the falling edge of the auxiliary triangular voltage at hold signal 25 due to the held or modified in the holding member 24 control voltage usi - The end of a switch-on is in the release interval during the rising edge of the triangular auxiliary voltage determined by the control voltage u $ in its current course.
    By holding or sampling the control voltage b / .w. Presetting of the following switch-on time and Abschaltfrcigabe from auxiliary voltage minimum is krcrstell that a present at the pulse end magnetization is completely controlled with the following pulse regardless of the control voltage Us.
    Fig.lc shows the PWM 10 according to the invention for the system in Fig.la, which is compared to the prior art with a possible further input 9 in a position, the energy transfer for a system according to the preamble in claim 1 due to another, preferably digital Terminate signal on line 9 at any time, about Bautcilschutz or for the purpose of precise limitation of a state variable (current limitation), as is possible with the forward converter. For this purpose, for example, iA is fed back to mixer 17. Mixer 17 outputs the difference between maximum value 19 and signal iA to two-point element 18, which generates the digital signal 9 and sends it to PWM 10. If the output current iA exceeds an adjustable value 1mAx, PWM 10 shuts off the pulse zt, z {or /. {, Which momentarily stops the power transmission.
    The PWM 10 pulses Z | and z based on the known averaging with inventive penetration door another digital signal 9. The full utilization of the dynamic resources of a push-pull inverter system according to Fig.la by signal z {possible that of a PWM 10 of Figure 7 or Fig.l lb is output.
    Fig. 2 shows the operation of this known control method in Fig.lb for a transformer coupled system with AC intermediate circuit uw in Fig.la when z0 pulses are shortened due to another digital signal x on line 9, e.g. for the purpose of current limitation. Diagram 27 shows triangular assist voltage Uhd and steady state control voltages us, bar- lined cingczeichuet is the course of the magnetization m, in this application, the amount of the observed magnetic flux in transformer 3 is designated, wherein the maximum value of the magnetization of the amplitude of the auxiliary triangular voltage Uhd corresponds. Diagram 28 shows output signal z0 of PWM in Fig.lb. During the falling edge of Uhd, a pulse is started due to the held control voltage usi-us (because stationary). During the following rising edge of uhd, the pulse deactivation takes place according to the enabled control voltage us. Diagram 29 shows signal x, which is generated, for example, from pulse to pulse current limitation, as shown in FIG. 1c. Diagram 30 shows the output signal zo 'with digital signal x. The duration of the alternating positive and negative voltage pulses of the resulting
    DC link alternating voltage uw in diagram 31 are now determined by the duration of the pulses of the modified PWM signal Zo '. Accordingly, two negative voltage pulses of uw now at times t6 'and tl3' due to signal x off prematurely. Starting from the steady-state symmetrical operating state up to the point in time t6 ', the course of the magnetic flux in transformer 3 is shown in diagram 32 according to the relationship Φ = ^ u ^ dl.
    In Fig. Lb to Lit./3/, as already stated, the switch-on of a pulse preset by control voltage, so that the course of the amount of flux in the transformer cc the course of the magnetization m in diagram 27 (dashed lines drawn) corresponds. The switch-on, to change from state 0 to state 1, of the positive voltage pulse at time tl occurs when Uhd falls below the control voltage recorded in usi. The switch-off, zo changes back from state 1 to state 0, is only possible from the release at time t2, in which transformer 3 is demagnetized. Thereafter, with the remaining pulse duration, until Uhd the 8 " the control voltage exceeds ug again at time t3, the magnetization is brought to the value corresponding to the new control voltage at time t3. With the retention of the control voltage at time t3 until the renewed release at the next minimum of at time t5, the magnetization m is stored at the same time. During the following falling edge of U | 1 (|, the next pulse of opposite (negative) polarity is started, when u ^ falls below the control voltage us held in u $ i, at time t4, and is turned on at time t4 with minimum pulse duration until t5 ,
    It is assumed a practical case that control voltage us has reached a maximum value at time t3, and another means, e.g. a current limit, via line 9 engages and pulses shortened.
    From the start of the pulse t4, the magnetization follows the course of the falling edge of the triangular auxiliary voltage Uhj until the demagnetization time t5 and then the course of the rising edge of U |, d until time t6 the show-off of this (negative) pulse by signal x on line 9. Control according to Lit./3/ stores at time t6 the modified setpoint voltage usi, which is no longer the already at time t6 'stored in transformer 3 magnetization m or | Φ | equivalent.
    At time t7, when the next pulse of opposite (positive) polarity is switched on, the now shorter demagnetization phase begins, which has already ended at time t8 before the next minimum of Uhd in t9. At pulse end t10, transformer 3 has a higher magnetization than the pulse width because the magnetic flux has shifted due to the shortened negative and the following undiminished positive pulses. The dashed magnetization curve has shifted from Uhd (see also diagram 32).
    Another flux shift in the same direction takes place when signal x shortens the next negative pulse which is started at time tl 1. Furthermore, it may happen that the premature switch-off takes place at a time t.sub.3 'before the next minimum of the auxiliary voltage u.sub.M in t.sub.12. At the next switching on of the positive pulse at time 114 no demagnetization phase is then started, but there is a further magnetization, wherein after a short pulse duration at time tl 5, the maximum magnetization is exceeded.
    A method constructed according to claim 1 also prevents any flux shift, but generates a PWM signal z] 5 whose pulses can be shortened due to a further signal x. Furthermore, according to claim 1, a signal Zj can be generated, which is no longer subject to the limitations of averaging (/2/./3/ ,/6/).
    First of all, the calculation of the mean value according to Lit, / 2,3,6 / is assumed. Unchanged, the improved method performs a control voltage change out in two steps, so that approximately the dynamics of a forward switching converter operated at the same switching frequency and having only one voltage pulse per switching period corresponding to the control voltage can be achieved, compared to the known methods e.g. however, with greater accuracy of current limiting.
    3 shows the functional diagram for a PWM according to FIG. 1 c with mean value formation, according to which shortening is possible in the activation phase pulse and the accuracy of a current limitation is increased. Magnetization signal m is piecewise obtained from the triangular auxiliary voltage u> j.
    The known PWM in Fig.lb (20-26) is extended with Abtasthaiteglied 33 and switch 34. Switch 34 Indicates inputs 0 for the modified drive voltage usi and ο
    Input l for magnetization signal m and switches one of the two inputs to output 20 and the input of mixer 21 through. Switch 34 is controlled by AND gate 38 in position 0 and by AND gate 36 in position 1. magnetization signal m is obtained with sample-holding member 33 from the auxiliary voltage uhtl. A scan of uhd occurs concurrently with the switching of switch 34 by signal 37 output from AND gate 36. In normal operation (x 1), the control voltage u i, which is remote from the holding member 24, is connected to the + input of mixer 21. The return to this position is done by the rising edges of enable signal 26, which are connected by AND gate 38 on line 39 until signal x at the second input in the state x -0 (pulse shortening) changes.
    Magnetization signal m is switched by switch 34 to the + input of mixer 21, as long as switch 34 is in position 1 (Pulsvcrkürzung). In this position, changeover switch 34 is controlled by the rising edge of signal 37, which also causes the sampling of auxiliary voltage Uhd at the same time. Signal 37 is output from AND gate 36 to which input side enable signal 26, hold signal or PWM signal z, on line 25 and the inverted signal x from inverter 35 are supplied. A sampling of auxiliary voltage Uhd with AH33 and the simultaneous switching from US34 from position 0 to position 1 takes place when the falling edge of signal x is to prevent the energy transfer, due to release signal 26 at the earliest after demagnetization in the release interval (signal 26 is 1). ,
    The operation of the method according to Figure 3 and claims ... will be explained with reference to the diagrams 40-46 in Figure 4. Control voltages u <, = usi and the premature disconnection points t6 'and tl 31 by the falling edges of signal x are assumed as shown in FIG.
    Diagram 40 shows auxiliary voltage Uhd, control voltage us = uSi, as well as dashed magnetization curve m, which has no displacement and piecewise from auxiliary voltage Uhd is composed. Diagram 41 shows enable signal 26. Diagram 42 shows signal x. In diagram 43 signal 37 is shown. The shift characterization of changeover switch 34 resulting from the release signal 26 and the downshift signal for US34 and changeover signal 37 is plotted in diagram 44; in diagram 45 signal Z | and in Diagram 46 the resulting intermediate circuit alternating voltage uw.
    In normal operation (x ~ l) to time t6 'enable signal 26 is turned on line 38 and US34 is in position 0. At time t6' signal x changes from state 1 to state 0. At the same time changes due to the inverted signal x, its state at t6 'changes from 0 to 1, signal 37 at the output of U36 changes from state 0 to state 1. Both z and enable signal 26 indicate at time t6 " State 1, because the falling edge of x in the release interval (signal 26 is one) occurs, and further not in a pulse pause (ζι :: Ό). With the rising edge of signal 37, the instantaneous value of the auxiliary voltage uj, a at time t6 'stored in sample holder 33 and is passed as magnetization signal m at input 1 of US34, which switches to position 1 due to the same rising edge of signal 37 and signal m to the entrance of mixer 21 places. During the rising edge of Uhd, the auxiliary voltage instantaneously exceeds its instantaneous value m, there is an immediate pulse cut-off, zi becomes zero. Signal 37 returns to state 0. Therefore, signal 37 is shown as a needle pulse at time 16 '.
    Kill! Signal m is now the magnetization at the premature shutdown time t6 'of the (negative) Spannungsimpulscs stored. This inhibits the override because the next switch-on of the (positive) pulse shifts from time t7 to time 17 ', so that the complete demagnetization takes place at the next release time t8. With rising edge of the enable signal cs holding member 24 is released, US34 brought back to position 0, and there is already described shutdown at time t9 and switching the following (negative) pulse in tl 1 in the following, in tlO beginning Fntmagnetisierungszeitraum [tl 0, t 12] (signal 26 is zero).
    Time tl 3 'of the renewed switch from x to state 0 falls in the demagnetization of the falling edge of the auxiliary voltage uhci and is ineffective until the following release time tl 2. At x-0, the rising edge of enable signal 26 at time tl 2 now passes to output 37 of AND gate 36. AH33 stores the minimum of the auxiliary triangular voltage and switch 34 switches the value stored in signal m to the input of mixers 21. Auxiliary voltage Uhd exceeds its minimum value sampled in m and the pulse deactivation takes place at the demagnetization time tl 2. Due to the minimum auxiliary voltage U | Kj fixed in m, the next switch-on occurs at the earliest in the next release time tl4. The rising edge of free signal 26 gives free holding member 24 and switches at x = l switch 34 in position 0 back. At the switch-off time tl 5, magnetization m corresponds to the course predetermined by the auxiliary voltage Uhd, and the following (negative) voltage pulse started in tl 6 may already again have the duration corresponding to the control value us.
    If x is still in state 0 at time tl2, there is no return switching from changeover switch 34, auxiliary voltage Uhd is again sampled at minimum, and no pulse start takes place.
    Signal x can come from a limiting device (FIG. 1c), so that it can be assumed that x returns to state 1 shortly after the pulse has been shortened, as shown. Any current limitation is no longer entirely tied to the limitations of control voltage processing, reducing the tendency to oscillate and increasing the accuracy of current limiting. Signal x can also be a start / stop signal. The shutdown can be faster, as in the known methods, because a current pulse in the release interval] (signal 26 is one) is terminated without dead time and with the last pulse a lower magnetization is reduced. The circuit is simple.
    In a further embodiment of the idea, the saturation protection can also be ensured in the case of premature pulse shortening in the demagnetization interval in the case of the mean value PWM.
    5 shows the functional diagram according to claims ... with full penetration for signal x. The output of the PWM in FIG. 3 is the signal /. A sampling of the auxiliary voltage Uhd by AH33 and the switching from US34 to position 1 is triggered by the falling edge of the shutdown signal 37. Because signal 37 can not cause a pulse shutdown in the degaussing interval, signal 37 is additionally routed to an input of AND gate 48, to the further input signal Z is connected. OK signal 49 is connected to the third input. AND gate 48 outputs the PWM signal z {'.
    Signal is fed back via line 25 to a control input of holding member 24, the inputs of pulse generator 60 and 52, and inverter 50. Shutdown signal 37 is generated by pulse generator 53, whose output is 1, but after a falling edge of signal x for a clock period state 0 assumes. Pulse 37 causes in the release interval the pulsation of , And thus also of z {. Effected in the demagnification interval
    Clock pulse 37, the shutdown of Z | '. This case is sensed by AND gate 59 which, in the degaussing interval, passes the clock pulse from pulser 60 to the reset input of RS flip-flop 55. RS55 resets OK signal 49, causing zf to turn off. Furthermore, signal 49 is fed to an input of AND gate 38 and prevents there the return to circuit of switch 34 in position 0 by means of output signal 39. OK signal 49 is formed at the output of RS55, which is fed back to the START input of counter 56 is. Release signal 26 is fed to the clock signal of counter 56. The start value 2 is applied to the preset input 57. At OK = 0, counter 56 counts down one on each falling edge of enable signal 26, to zero. When zero is reached, output signal 58 transitions from state 0 to state 1, resetting RS55 and maintaining the counter in that state. State 1 is the stable state of rest.
    The reset of FF55 is done by the output of AND gate 59. An input of U59 is supplied by the output of the pulse shaper 60, which outputs a pulse on falling edge of / | ', that is, when a voltage pulse is switched off. Enable signal 26 is inverted by inverter 61 and the inverted signal is applied to the second input of U59. A pulse from pulse shaper 60 therefore only goes to the reset input of FF55 in the demagnification interval.
    In the release interval, pulse shortening is effected by signal 37, AH33 and US34, as described in FIG. Signal Z] changes to state 0 almost simultaneously with signal 37. RS55 remains set and signal 49 is in state 1. In the demagnetization interval, however, Z | causes the pulse shortening in the demagnetization of AND gate 48 due to the signals 37 and 49 occurs. Signal 37 at the input of U48 causes the disconnection of zj 'and the reset of signal 49, whereby z remains switched off. In a further embodiment of the inventive idea, with outputs 37, 49 also during the demagnetization phase, a pulse cut-off Z 1 'is output to pulse pattern generator 11 (FIG. 1 a) and fed back instead of z 1.
    Signal 37 is produced at the output of (needle) pulse shaper 53 whose input is connected to line 47 to the output of OR gate 51. Signal x is routed to an input of OR gate 51. Connected to the other two inputs are the outputs of pulse shaper 52 and inverter 50, which are supplied at the input side by the fed back PWM signal Z [(25). Digital signal Z 'is fed back to the input of inverter 50 in order to shift an edge of signal 47 falling possibly in the pulse interval (inverted signal Zj') until the start of the pulse. (In the pulse pause the triangular auxiliary voltage does not correspond to the magnetization curve.)
    Output 47 is in state 1 during the pulse pauses and can now change to state 0 even in the demagnetization period. Negative pulse 37 brings Zj 'to state 0, which is extended by signal 49. Pulse generator 52 is triggered by turning on zf and outputs a pulse 54 of duration c. Due to signal 54, a possible state 0 of signal x when switching on Z | ' only by a duration c later to a falling edge of signal 47, so that even with a continued state 0 of signal x, the magnetization is deactivated. Pulsformcr 52 generates at the input side switching of zi (change from 0 to 1) at the output a pulse of adjustable length c. Thus, should x be a STOP signal and already at pulse start in state 0 (unlikely in the case of pulse to pulse current limiting, because x is reset after pulse shortening), the falling edge of signal 47 is delayed to allow a demagnification pulse of duration c can be executed. If there is no demagnetization, the demagnetization is continued with the next but one voltage pulse of the same polarity, so that also in this t2
    Case the magnetization is squeezed. Without this measure, the magnetization stored in transformer 3, unlike the value stored in AH33, would decay due to parasitic effects. According to the method, since a degaussing interval starts with a switch-on, the switch-on pulse would be too long by this loss and the maximum magnetization could be exceeded.
    Furthermore, averaging does not work in this case (see Fig. 2, time tl4), therefore, the next impulse of opposite polarity must be suppressed. The next but one pulse with the same polarity of the shortened pulse starts with value m, which must be stored over the omitted pulse of opposite polarity, until the pulse start and in this time also a return switch from US34 is suppressed.
    The mode of operation of the method will be explained with reference to the curves in FIG. In the diagram 62 again auxiliary voltage Uhd, control voltage us ~ usi and observed magnetization m, diagram 63 Z , diagram 64 signal x, diagram 65 signal 47, diagram 66 release signal 26, diagram 67 signal 49, diagram 68 ζΓ and diagram 69 Zwischenkreiswcchselspannung uw , the suppressed (positive) impulses are indicated by dotted lines.
    By way of example, in the demagnetization period [tl0, tl2], the onset of a negative pulse of uw at time tl 1 and the premature shutdown at time tl3 'are effected by signal x. The output of inverter 50 indicates with state 0 that there is a pulse. The pulse c triggered on switching on input 54 was ignored because by time t13 'x = 1. Both other outputs, which are connected to inputs of OR gate 51, are in state 0, so that signal x also changes signal 47 at the output of OR gate 51 from state 1 to state 0. The change triggers pulse generator 53, with whose output signal on line 37 zf is switched off. Due to the feedback on line 25, the output of inverter 50 changes to state 1 and draws signal 47, which is why signal 47 appears very briefly as a needle pulse in this time scale. Needle pulse 47 is slightly lengthened by pulser 53, so output z {remains safely in state 0 until output 49 of FF55 also switches to state 0. The reset of FF55 occurs almost simultaneously by pulse generator 60 on the falling edge of the feedback PWM signal z {'(25).
    Simultaneously with the shutdown of zf Uhd is sampled, stored magnetization m and connected to the input of mixer 21. While OK signal 49 is in state 0, there is no further activation of AH33 and no return control of changeover switch 34. The next pulse [tl4 ', tl 5'] of zi is generated on the basis of the stored magnetization m, but in zf, however, by means of OK. Signal 49 suppressed. Counter 56 counts down one at time tl4. At the next falling edge of enable signal 26 at time tl 5 counter 56 counts to zero and w'ieder sets the OK signal.
    Signal x is still in state 0, signals 47, 37 in state 1. At time tl 6, a pulse start takes place. The output edge occurring by feedback to the input of inverter 50 falling edge is ausgelcndet by output 54 of pulse generator 52 and occurs at the adjustable time period c later at output 47. The output of a demagnification pulse of the width c, which is determined by the pulse generator 52. From the needle pulse 47 at the turn-off time tl 8 " the sequence from tl3 'to tl6 repeats with the resampled magnetization.
    The procedure is simple, but the pulse omission can also favor oscillations in a fast limiting circle. Due to the higher dynamics and due to the higher transformer utilization, it is advantageous to control the
    Transform magnetization of the auxiliary voltage of the pulse width modulator decouple.
    7 shows the Signalflußbild for the new control method according to claim 1 for generating a highly dynamic PWM signal z2 'of control voltage us and digital signal x.
    Mixer 70 receives on the input side signal x (9) and control voltage us (8) and outputs control value a (t). Mixer 70 turns on control voltage us at output α when signal x is in state 1, and outputs tx (t) -0 when signal x is in state 0. The modified with signal x control voltage α is fed to a -i input of PWM (71-73.22). Mixer 71 has compared to known pulse width modulators on another ^ input, is processed with the Symmetrierungskorrektur Δ0. As in the conventional PWM, a sawtooth-shaped auxiliary voltage 72 is fed to the input of the mixer and generates two-point element 22 from result 73 PWM signal Z2. AND gate 93 and pulse generator 95 receive the input side signal z2. The outputs of AND gate 93 and pulse generator 95 are applied to the inputs of the OR gate 97, which outputs z2 '. The disconnection of z2 'can now take place due to another generated by subtractor 74 and two-point member 75 digital signal 76 at the other input of the AND gate, when magnetization m 77 reaches the value set on line 78 Mmax. In the case of the pulse shutdown by output 76, the following turn on of z2 occurs' by the pulse generator, which is triggered by the rising edge of z2. Due to the onset Ummagnetisicrung magnetization 77 falls below the set on line 78 value, signal 76 is set again and PWM signal z2 of AND gate 93 to the output z2 'through.
    Signal z2: is fed back on line 79 to the input of observer 80. Observer 80 generates magnetization signal m at output 77, which is further fed to an input of balancing means 81 (82-84).
    Symmetrization device 81 includes mixer 82, which calculates from control value α the magnetization msYM that would occur in symmetric operation, difference element 83 and another mixer 84 with the transfer function k, which in particular can be a fixed or variable value between 0 and 2. The difference element determines from the control value a and the magnetization signal m with the correct sign the height of a possible flux shift U and outputs the result U to mixer k. Mixer k calculates symmetrization value Λδ.
    The same Symmetrierungswirkung can be achieved with relatively large or relatively small Symmetrierungs values Δδ. For a dynamic stretch behavior larger and slowly decreasing values are advantageous. In the limiting mode small and rapidly decreasing Δδ will be good. With a possible further input 85, the calculation rule in mixer k can be changed. For example, signal x can also be routed to input 85 (dashed connection) so that a small balancing value Δδ or even Δδ-O is output to mixer 71 at the same time as control value zero.
    Theoretically, the spectrum of the control voltage α modified with signal x and of result 20 or 73 may contain high switching-frequency components which occur suddenly, stop and likewise disappear again suddenly. Filter 87 detects switching-frequency interventions, for example by signal x or by a control voltage modified with signal x, and is dotted. In applications Lit / 2 / - / 6 / there is no saturation protection for this case, except Lit / 2 /, / 6 / if the pulses of a switching period are preset. Because this is associated with the disadvantage of a larger dead time, the more dynamic pulse to pulse averaging has become Lit / 2 /,
    Claim 6 m application / 3 / enforced and works with comparable certainty, as the forward converter. Detector 87 may gain importance in future applications, but does not occupy much space in a fast microprocessor or signal processor and increases the robustness of the system.
    According to the method, it is now possible with filter detector 87 to ensure the balancing of the power transformer 3 even with switching-frequency interventions. Process-dependent flux shifts can also be deactivated in the case of massive, sustained-frequency interventions with adjustable speed occurring in the meantime. It protects the process by which an observer is balanced, a pulse shutoff signal is generated when the observer reaches the magnetization limit, and this signal is fed to the input of a filter which sets the magnetization limit.
    The output of detector 87 is magnetization maximum value 78. A sustained switching frequency superposition is present when every second pulse, ie either successive positive or negative voltage pulses z ^ 'of signal 76 are turned off. Output 76 and signal 86 are routed to inputs of detector 87. Signal 86 is output from sawtooth generator 72. When using a 8-bit continuous counter, signal 86 is a clock pulse when the counter of 2S-1 = 255 skips to zero. The length of the clock pulse in this example is 1/512 of the resulting phase, which includes a positive and a negative voltage pulse. Clock pulse 86 toggles a T-FF. While the output of TFF is 0, only voltage pulses of one (e.g., negative) polarity of uw can occur, and in state 1 only pulses of the other (positive) polarity can occur.
    An event is the falling edge of output 76. An event is stored in RS1 if it occurs during state 1 of TFF and in RSO if it occurs during state 0. Saving an event causes the reset of the other event memory. If an event memory is set as time progresses and is not reset by the other in the following half-cycle, except when cs occurs, the reset occurs automatically at the end of this half-period. Each time an event occurs with the event memory already set, there will be no automatic reset at the end of the half cycle and output 78 will be reduced. This process may be repeated until the pulse of opposite polarity due to the reduced magnetization limit of signal 76 is also turned off, the event memory is finally reset by the other event memory, and symmetrical operation is present. If one event memory is reset by the other (limit operation), or if both event memories are reset or in state 0 (normal operation), output 78 is increased or reset to the preset value.
    With the additional change of the magnetization limit 78 by the operating voltage UB a taxation is effected if necessary or in addition, the magnetic stress of the transformer core can be made independent of the operating voltage. Advantageously, magnitude integrator or magnetization counter 88 (see FIG. 8) and sawtooth generator 72 (FIG. 7) can be operated with the same clock frequency or fixed clock frequency ratio, which eliminates the need for synchronization.
    8 shows the block diagram of the magnitude observer. Signal zT is fed back via line 79 to the start / stop output of integrator 88 and is integrated when 1. While the integrator is stopped. The direction of integration is determined by the signal on line 92. Integrator 88 generated by integration of zM magnetization m and digital signal 89 which is 1 as long as m is zero. A rising edge of signal 89 when the magnetic flux changes direction, passes to an input of OR gates 90 and 15 to the set input of RS flip-flop 91. Its output 92 pulls the count down (state 0) or up {state 1) fcstlegt. Arrived at zero. Integrator 88 will automatically go up in the up direction until the end of the pulse.
    The determination of the counting direction for the following pulse start occurs at the pulse end by clock pulse 93, the output of pulse 94 at falling edge of z2 'and conditional switch 124 either in position 0 via OR gate 96 to the set input, or in position 1 to the Reset input of RS91 is switched. The output of OR gate 96 is connected to the set input and OR gate 96 is transparent to both inputs.
    The switch position 0 or 1 of switch 124 corresponds to the counting direction or output 92 of RS91, so that a clock pulse 93, ie a pulse end of z2 reset during the counting up in position 1 RS97. Occurs pulse end 93 already during the count down in position 0, so instead of reset the not yet done setting of RS97, which increases from the next pulse, the magnetization increases, see Fig.2, time t! 4.
    Integrator 88 may be implemented as a digital magnetizer counter; which is 1 bit less than the continuous count auxiliary voltage counter 72, and can operate at the same clock frequency.
    The derivation of the arithmetic instructions for controlling a weeding element system in FIG. 1 a carried out in balancing device 81 is based on the functional diagram in FIG. 7 with reference to the diagram in FIG.
    For the purpose of simple circuit realization and the derivation of the simplest possible calculation instructions, magnetization m and switch-on time δ are normalized quantities: m MO1 [0... 0.5] and S = 'i 2 2.7), " Ts
    The representation of the continuous cycle that magnetization m undergoes in each switching period is constructed on the bidirectional time axis 96. By convention (vice versa would be just as well) follows magnetization m during a positive voltage pulse of uw curve 77 in the positive direction of axis 96 and during a negative pulse in the negative direction. For example, magnetization rn during the positive pulse δ.2 of the duration 97 follows the course 77 of m from the start state 98 to the zero point and from there to the state 987 A negative voltage pulse δ Observer or Transfonnator of state 98 'back to state 98 of the same duration.
    With α is also normalized to 1 value of control voltage us. In the symmetrical operating case a_x = S_t, Δ <7_, = 0 and, for the switch-on time of the 0th switch-on time, further 2
    The capital letter M stands for the magnetization stored during the pulse break in the transformer and the observer.
    A flux shift arises from the fact that the entire occurring in the 0-th half-period control value change is carried out with pulse width 99, with the turn-on time t> 0 = a0 = a_, + Δα_χ, (Δδ.ι = 0). 16
    The states 101, 10Γ are the symmetric states for the new value (¾.) With Δα ,, (t) = a (tj "+,) ~ cr" = 0, the turn-on times cn become <&gt; =) + Λίϊ) ', - ι - n = 0, l, 2 ...
    With the positive pulse of duration 99, transformer 3 is controlled from state 98 to state 100 '. The magnetization is too high by the value Uo (102). Mixer 83 calculates 100 'imbalance 102 from the stored magnetization Mo and the value Mon, Sym = tt (/ 2, and outputs the value to mixer 84 in the pulse pause, the length of the pulse duration 103, to transformer 3 with the following negative pulse from state 100 'to the operating state 101 symmetric for ao, is 2>, = a ,; + Αδ (ι with ΔΔ () = U0.
    In the case of complete control of the flux shift with Δδο (104), k-1, mixer 84 can be omitted, and mixer 71 provides the desired result 73 (Figure 7), whereafter PWM pulse Z2 has the duration 103 cc ö ΔΔ2 &gt;; 0 = an + - Όΰ = Mü λ-.
    In the time period i, the higher magnetization Mo is degraded from state 100 'and re-magnetized to the symmetrical magnetization a0 / 2, whereby the control value change is amplified.
    The method according to the invention is shown in FIG. 7 by a δη = α (ΪΛ, ") + Δδη_ | , with ΔΔίΗ = / ((/ ".,), U, H = A /" _, - described, with transformer 3 either with the turn-on time = M "- + of magnetization Mn. | On magnetization M" re-magnetized or with
    Sn = M-Mn, which need not be treated separately (observers), only partially demagnetized. Here, in the first half period with turn-on time δ | Balancing value Δδ0 is a function of the flux shift Uo detected at the end of the 0th half-period [0,1V2] (see also FIG. 12), which is defined by the jump Λα_ | incurred Einschaltzcit δ0 has emerged. For AÖ "_i = k-Un-i, k is a rational number, we have Δίζ cc * 0 = 'O'o = ^ - + D0, Δό0 - k · U0, 2> - tt + ASn.
    With M [= 6 | -Mo and α ,, - αο, n_0, 1.2 ..., V, = -U "(1 - *) and M, = -1/0 (l - *). 17
    Thus ^ = kv {^ l) ' and Δί> "- k - = k L , (k -1Γ1, n-0,1,2 .....
    A control of the asymmetry, is only at k -1 | &Lt; 1 given. This is the case for 0 <k <2.
    In Fig.lü two ways to control the Flußverlagerung are exemplified for kM, 5 and k = 0.5. For 1 <k <2, an exponentially decreasing gain of the control value jump takes place until the unbalance is removed. The pulses 108 and 109 of the 0th switching period are highlighted. The on-time 108, with which transformer 3 is controlled from state 100 'to state 105, is
    It follows that M, = M ^, a + U "Ut
    U (γγ, 2j M0, sym = ao / 2, and, Δδ.ι = υ., = 0, n = 0, l, 2,3, .... 2,1 J (1 γ än = &lt; Xo + H, -i = ao + ^ f ·· Ί
    With a settling time, 3t / ,, tri - (Xn + Δ <7ι - (Xis +, transformer 3 is controlled from state 105 to 107 '.) After two pulses, unsymmetric U0 (102) is reduced to 1/4 of the original flux Uo Depending on the sign of Uo, the control is effected exclusively with pulse shortenings or pulse extensions in the sense of amplifying the causing control value change Δα_ι The regulator can be relieved and the balancing of transfomiator (3) can be used to increase the dynamics or speed up the process control.
    For methods with 0 &lt; k &lt; 1, the magnetization amplitudes M "of m (77) from both sides converge to Mo.sym, and the pulse widths o" from both sides converge to the new pulse width &lt; xo. At k = 0.5, transformer 3 is controlled in the 0th half-cycle with the dot-dashed pulses 110 and 111 from state 100 'through 106 to 107'. It applies Γ8 ·
    In these methods, the Sollwcrtsprung is only slightly increased, in particular with respect to the mean value of the pulse duration of the following switching period. The mean value of the switch-on times of the acoustic period following execution of Δα_ι with switch-on time δο is
    8 + δ 2
    The energy transferred by the transformer (3) after execution of the desired value jump already largely corresponds to the control value (8).
    In both cases, an asymmetry resulting from the setpoint step change in the O-tcn half-cycle period is exponentially decayed. There is no dead time and full throttle penetration is given. Any 0 <k <2 can be set.
    The reliability of the control method is based on the fact that the symmetrizing effect of device 81 is greater than that of the parasitic effects, which also cause a decay of the flux shift. Therefore, it is not only possible, but in this sense even desirable to run transformer 3 without air gap. The same magnetic flux is formed at a much smaller magnetizing current. The inverters of the inverter are freed from additional shutdown work and the efficiency of the inverter can be increased. Due to the highest possible coupling inductance, a flux shift due to the parasitic effects decays very slowly and the cancellation of a flux shift due to a sudden change in the control value can be particularly slow, e.g. in order to make a PT [ath, which can be formed by output inductance 7 and an ohmic load 5 (FIG.
    It can be done with N pulses a complete linear Absteuung the Flußverlagerung. For N pulses, the imbalance U ,, n = ~ is determined. This is
    λ.o N AS "= N-U", "- k.
    Consider 1 &lt; k &lt; 2. From the condition
    that with each pulse a N-th of the flux shift is deactivated, follows k = 2-.
    N
    At N = 1, k = 1, and complete cancellation with the next pulse, as discussed. For N> 2, the nth pulse applies
    For N = 2, k = 2-l / N = 3/2, and Ö2.o = Uo / 2, the pulse durations of a switching period become AJ ,,, = (3-2n) -U2ü, n = 0, l , 19
    Transformer 3 is brought from state 105 to 10Γ, wherein in state 1 05 no recalculation of Flussverlagcrung is made.
    With N, the D-part is set, which is added to the setpoint step in the Stuuerspannung, for the purpose of rapid control of non-linear processes (arcing, shutdown). Number N can theoretically be set high. At N> 2, e.g. N = 50, it is also useful for relatively slow processes to prematurely update a cutoff if e.g. the 37-st pulse shutdown was triggered by output 76 because magnetization (77) has reached the saturation limit 78 (Figure 7).
    In principle, the control value is used to set the energy that is transmitted with transformer (3). The Absteucrung the imbalance can now also be such that the average value of the turn-on of the following on an executed Stuuklwertsprung switching periods corresponds to the control value exactly. Now, let a completely linear ramp down be desired so that the energy transferred with each following switching period with transformer (3) equals control value α, therefore 0 <k <1 is selected. If the mean value of the pulse durations of a switching period following a control value jump is to correspond to the control value (for example, solar converter), the unbalance control must be divided into at least two pulses. With each successive pulse, the unbalance is canceled by u0N = - ^.
    The condition is
    It follows with 6o = ao + kUo and M <j = ao / 2 + Uo immediately (k-I / N) Uo = 0, or k = 1 ·.
    N
    At N = 1, k_l and it is the complete Absteuerung with the next pulse, as treated. For N> 2, for the nth pulse, δSj1 =, ASNji = Uv o * (-1),, n = 0 ... N-1. For N = 2, k = 1 / N = 1/2, and U2, o = Uo / 2, Δ = ("Ό" · ϋ20. N = 0, l.
    Transformer 3 is brought from state 106 in the symmetrical operating state 101 ', wherein in Pulpause 106 no redetermination of the flux shift is made. Another highly dynamic requirement may in practice be e.g. It is to interrupt the operation for a short time, which is bridged by the output filler and in which the solar panel is not to be charged, for the purpose of recording operational parameters.
    It is not possible to determine the imbalance of each impulse endc, but less frequently. It may also be exponential and linear Absteuerungen prevail in certain periods. Furthermore, the k-value can also be changed during operation and a complete control of a flux shift can be carried out at any time, or a complete demagnetization can be carried out. 2Ό ·
    Fig.lla shows the signal flow picture for the known average method according to / 2 /, claim 6, with sägezahnformigcr auxiliary voltage U | V /. With the switch-off of zo, the switch on is fixed, as well as control value ot ", which is sampled with AH 121 and fed to the input of mixer 122. Mixer 122 receives the current control value a (t) at the + input and continuously outputs the difference Δαιι.1 (/) = ατ (ί) -α ", to mixer 84, in which the current correction is calculated and sent to a + input is output from mixer 71. At the second input of mixer 71 is control value u (t). At the input of mixer 71 is auxiliary voltage uh7. at. The activation of z2 'takes place on falling edge of the auxiliary voltage or counter overflow. The on-time generated by PWM (71-73,22) is 6 "
    Aay, (0 a ^ + ajt) 2 2
    The same result is obtained directly with the procedure according to / 3 / with triangular auxiliary voltage. Control value an.i is the sampled or modified control voltage usi and ü (t) the enabled control voltage us. If control value a (t) jumps to zero, in any case the complete demagnetization takes place with the minimum switch-on time -Δαη-ι / 2.
    FIG. 11b shows, starting from FIG. 7, the signal flow diagram of the new method, when the correction value Δδ is calculated directly from the changes in the accumulated values Δα.
    Control value a (t) at the output of mixer 70 is routed to the O input of switch 120. At the 1 input of the output of sample-holding member 119 is connected, at the input of the sawtooth auxiliary voltage U | 17 is performed. Switch 120 switches either input 0 or input 1 to output α. At each pulse start 86, switch 120, if in position 1, is controlled to position 0. Shutdown pulse 76, when the maximum magnetization has been reached, is output by pulse generator 123 on falling edge of output 75 and controls switch 120 in position 1, triggers a sample of the auxiliary voltage with AH 119, and effects the output of Δδ = until the next pulse start 86 0 by mixer 84. Because the Sägezahnförmigc auxiliary voltage exceeds their sampled instantaneous value, the instantaneous shutdown of Z2 'is carried by two-point member 22, wherein in control value α, the pulse duration is stored in this case. PWM signal z2 'causes the sampling of the control value α and its storage as α ,,.! With each pulse deactivation (falling edge)! in AH 121. In mixer 122, the previous value a ".2 is still stored. In mixer 122, the value Aal, .2- (a, i. | -An-2) '/ 2 is output to mixer 84 and is overwritten at a2 with a "_i. Mixer 84 calculates correction value Δδη for the following impulse. With k-0.5, the flux shift is completely controlled by each Δα1> 2 with the following pulse correction Δδη.ι = Λαη.2 / 2,
    However, if only 1 / Nth of the flux shift is to be deactivated with the following pulse, then the uncontrolled flux displacements are superposed, which is why mixer 84 corrects the correction value Δδ
    &quot; I Δ δ. k Ί Χ · ΣΑα "η,!., · = 0
    ί 1 U V &quot; } k 1_ Ν would have to calculate.
    In the procedure of Figure 7, when the flux shift
    U .., = M η-1
    , is observed with M ". | = m (tA i, n), but the control value change can also be mitigated otherwise by e.g. the Flußvcrlagerung is shut off with the turn-on of the Gleichpoligen voltage pulses, which contain only a part of the control value change, while the opposite-pole pulses completely correspond to the control value change. The series = k • / {m) * Un_m, f (0) ~ 1, | f (m) | <1 and strictly monotone decreasing, mH) can be aborted at any time. Due to the constant current Ennittlung the flux displacement is a permanent magnetization control possible, also in the form of a decaying vibration. The cancellation time can be extended very far. With the calculation realizable in mixer k
    M Δό '"= k ^ f (m) Un, m, f (m) a function stored in mixer k, m-0 can be a control value jump Aa. | in the switch-on times δη, n = 0,1, ..., a nearly arbitrary behavior can be added due to the resulting flux displacements Un_i in order to better control non-linear processes and / or to relieve the regulator and / or to influence the system behavior specifically.
    Depending on the PWM signal zo or different PWM signals zi 'resulting gradients of DC link AC voltage Uw and magnetization m, dashed gezzichnct, after a control value jump from a _] = U_i = 0 to uo = 0.5, according to the strong gezzichichten course of the control voltage are shown in diagrams 112-118 in Fig.12. If the control value change was carried out without dead time 125, then the flux shift Uo arises. Arrow 126 indicates the disconnection, at which the symmetrical ßetricbszinstand reach! is.
    Diagram (112) shows control value α and sawtooth auxiliary voltage Uhz-
    Course z0 in diagram (113) is produced when, according to Lit./2/, step value a (t) is processed once per switching period. Advantageously, there is immunity to switching-frequency superpositions which occur in the meantime over a plurality of switching cycles and to control value a (t), which is lost in pulse-to-pulse averaging. The disadvantage here is dead time 125.
    In diagram 114, dead time 125 is halved by processing control value α twice per switching period, that is for each pulse, according to Lit./2,3/. With the switch-on time, "" -ί + "Ü, J _ ...) ° n ~ 2 &quot; - α »-ι + o
    If flux shifts are largely prevented.
    In diagrams 115 to 118 is proceeded to Fig.7. A control value jump is executed completely, after
    Su = a (tAM) + Αδι: _ ,, ιι ^ Ο, 1.2.with Λδη.
    -kUn.i, and L ", = MU
    There is no dead time, but a Flußverlagerung Un, which is abgeschcuert to the arrow 126 schczeichnelen Abschaltzcitpunkt.
    In Diagram 11 5, the control of the flow delay Uo with k = I takes place with the switch-on time t! 7 f _f> i - ct0 + 60, T0 ^ In diagram (116) the switch-on times are determined with k ~ l, 5. The one-time amplification has been expanded to an exponentially decaying D component (curve 127), which can be added to the control voltage us.
    In diagrams 117 and 118, after execution of the control value jump with the two pulses of the following switching period, N = 2, a complete linear Absteucrung the flux displacement, see arrow 126th
    In Diagram 117, the correction width Δδ0 and Δδ | for the pulses of a switching period with k = 2-l / N = l, 5 to Δδ2ιι = (3-2n) · U2 0, n = 0,!, with U20 = calculated, whereby the Steuerweitsprung is amplified. In diagram 118, the calculation of the correction values for the pulses of a switching period with k = 1 / N = 0.5 is done after Δ <52. "= (-1) &quot; · ^ 2.o, n = 0, l, with U2 0 =.
    The mean value of the pulse durations of the switching period [Ts / 2, 3Ts / 2] following the control value jump on a () following the half-period [0, Ts / 2] corresponds to the new value a () = 0.5.
    Reference designation: 1 Operating voltage 15 Control line 2 Differential-mode inverter 16 Controller 3 Transformer 17 Difference generator 4 Output rectifier 18 Two-point link 5 Load 19 Line, maximum value 6 Netw ork harder 20 Line, signal, result 7 Output inductance 21 Difference generator 8 Line voltage 22 Two-point link 9 Line, digital signal x 23 FI i 1 fsspannungsquell c 10 Pulse width modul ator 24 Holding element 11 Pulse pattern generator 25 Line, PWM signal zo 12 Control line 26 Line, enable signal 13 Control line 27 Diagram 14 Control line 28 Diagram
    Diagram 79 Line, PWM signal zi 'Diagram 80 Observer Diagram 81 Symmetrization device Diagram 82 Mixer sample-and-hold element 83 Diffcrcnzbildner Switch (demultiplexer) 84 Mixer k Inverter 85 Line, control input AND gate 86 Line, switch-on signal Line, signal 87 Balancing device AND- Gate 88 Integrator, Counter Line, Signal 89 Line, Diagram 90 OR gate Diagram 91 RS flip-flop Diagram 92 Line, signal Diagram 93 AND gate Diagram 94 Pulse shaper Diagram 95 Pulse shaper Diagram 96 Axis line, signal 97 OR gate AND gate 98, 98 'symmetrical states line, OK signal 99 positive voltage pulse inverter 100' state OR gate 101, 101 'symmetric states pulse shaper 102 flux shift U pulse shaper 103 negative pulse line 104 correction value Δδ RS flip-flop 105 state counter 106 state preset Input 107 'state line 108 negative voltage pulse AND gate 109 positive he voltage pulse pulse shaper 110 negative voltage pulse inverter 111 positive momentum pulse diagram 112 diagram diagram 113 diagram diagram 114 diagram diagram 115 diagram diagram 116 diagram diagram 117 diagram diagram 118 diagram diagram 119 sample hold mixer 120 changeover switch (demultiplexer) mixer 121 sample hold auxiliary supply source 122 Mixer Cable, signal, result 123 Pulse generator D i fo ad m e dner 124 Switch (Multiplexer) Two-point link 125 Dead-time cable, switch-off signal 126 Arrow, switch-off line, signal m cable, maximum value 127 Control value off
    权利要求:
    Claims (7)
    [1]
    1. A method for controlling the power transmission via alternately to a DC voltage (UB) to be switched transformers (3), in particular of pulse width modulated half or full bridge inverter (2), wherein the inverter (2), the primary coil of the transformer (3) preferably supplies the three voltage states positive voltage (Uß), negative voltage (-Uß) and voltage zero (0), and wherein a pulse width modulator (10) generates a PWM signal (zO), the duration (δ) a pulse (zo) determines, via which the primary coil is connected positively or negatively to the DC voltage circuit, and wherein the duration (δ) of a required height of an output of a at a secondary winding of the transformer (3), preferably via a rectifier connected consumer or a control value (a). characterized in that a maximum allowable magnetization of the transformer (3) is not exceeded and the pulse width modulator (10) generates a PWM signal (zl, zT or z2 '), after which each positive or negative voltage pulse at the transformer (3), in particular due a further signal (9) or a control value (a), the full current control value change (Δα), so that the premature shutdown of a voltage pulse (uw) can also take place when a process variable (iA) exceeds a maximum value (Imax).
    [2]
    2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pulse shortening of the PWM signal (zO in the release interval and / or in the demagnetization takes place.
    [3]
    3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the magnetization of the transformer (3) is adjusted to a dreieckformigen auxiliary voltage and that the dynamics of a forward converter is achieved in that for current limiting the required control value change (Δα) directly and completely executed becomes.
    [4]
    4. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the PWM signal is output to an observer (80), who by monitoring the course of the PWM signal (zj1) continuously receives a magnetization signal (m (t)) of the magnetization of the transformer (3), and that the drive circuit shortens the current pulse of (.Z2 ') when the magnetization signal (m (t)) exceeds a maximum value (Μμαχ) to immediately stop the further magnetization of the transformer (3).
    [5]
    5. The method according to any one of claims 1 or 4, characterized in that a symmetrization device (81) based on the control voltage (usoll) and the magnetization signal (m (t)) determines the magnetization (msyxi), which would occur in the symmetrical operation of the inverter whereby a control value (a) is generated for adjusting the immediately following turn-on time of the PWM signal in order to effect a subsequent symmetrization of the magnetization of the transformer.
    [6]
    6. The method according to any one of claims 1 or 4, characterized in that the symmetrization without observer due to the executed control value changes (Δα) in the Symmetrisierungseinrichtung (84,119-122) takes place. I die_ REPLACED
    [7]
    7. The method according to one or more of claims 1,4,5,6, characterized in that in the case of a switching frequency with a changing setpoint, the symmetrization of the transformer (3) by a device (87), magnetization upper limit decreases.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    AT504010B1|2008-10-15|IGNITION DEVICE FOR AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
    AT403865B|1998-06-25|VOLTAGE CONVERSION DEVICE FOR A DC VOLTAGE CONSUMER
    EP0414317A2|1991-02-27|Inverter device
    EP1880096B1|2009-10-28|Method and device for electrically actuating a valve with a mechanical closing element
    AT511298A1|2012-10-15|DYNAMIC PWM CONTROL FOR TRANSFORMER-COUPLED COUNTER-TERM INVERTERS
    DE102008036113B4|2009-10-01|Current regulator and method for current regulation
    EP3523873B1|2020-11-04|Direct current converter and method for its operation
    DE2935322A1|1980-03-20|CONTROL DEVICE FOR A TRANSFORMER
    DE102013107792A1|2015-01-22|CONTROL UNIT FOR A CONVERTER AND CONTROL PROCEDURE
    WO2014082943A1|2014-06-05|Dc-to-dc converter having efficiency-guided adaptation of the working frequency
    DE3222994A1|1983-01-13|Self-oscillating invertor
    DE2731501C3|1980-08-14|Control arrangement for a direct current motor operated with series connection-shunt switching
    DE2715133B2|1979-05-31|Modulation amplifier
    DE2656620B2|1979-06-07|Regenerative braking control device for direct current series motors
    EP3772166A1|2021-02-03|Pulse width modulation method for voltage inverter fed transformers
    AT505507B1|2010-03-15|METHOD AND DEVICES FOR RESTRICTING INDUCTION IN THE CORE OF FORMALLY TRANSFORMERS SWITCHED TO AN EQUAL VOLTAGE
    DE102012108456A1|2013-03-14|Power converter enabling the suppression of a bias of the magnetic flux in a converter of the converter
    EP2942142B1|2019-07-10|Method for regulating a welding power source
    EP0415485A2|1991-03-06|Installation to generate current pulses of an established form in an inductive user
    EP3840203A1|2021-06-23|Method for generating alternating positive and negative voltage pulses of a transformer primary voltage
    DE3539647C2|1994-05-26|Circuit arrangement for a pulse controlled AC power controller
    DE1929444A1|1969-12-18|Static tap changeover switch for transformers
    EP3672053A1|2020-06-24|Control method for a dual active bridge series resonant converter and dual active bridge series resonant converter operating on the basis of this method
    DE102014103027A1|2015-09-10|Tracking controller for a V / f-controlled asynchronous machine
    DE2411889C3|1976-12-02|Control device for a converter arrangement
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    WO2012130426A3|2012-11-22|
    WO2012130426A2|2012-10-04|
    AT511298B1|2014-06-15|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US4477867A|1981-08-28|1984-10-16|Data General Corporation|Core saturation control circuit|
    DE4120112C1|1991-06-15|1992-08-13|Aeg Westinghouse Transport-Systeme Gmbh, 1000 Berlin, De|Symmetrising PWM transformer feeding inverter bridges - involves force switching off electronic switches of bridge branch pairs independently of control|
    US5550498A|1995-08-30|1996-08-27|Industrial Technology Research Institute|Method and apparatus for charge pulse-width modulation control|
    EP1635448A1|2004-09-09|2006-03-15|ABB Oy|Speed sensorless control of an induction machine using a PWM inverter with output LC filter|
    AT505507A1|2007-05-15|2009-01-15|Lutz Erhartt|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR LIMITING THE INDUCTION IN THE CORE OF CHANGING TRANSFORMERS SWITCHED ON A DC VOLTAGE|
    EP2034322A1|2007-09-06|2009-03-11|Infineon Technologies Austria AG|Control circuit for driving a semiconductor switch|EP3840203A1|2019-12-20|2021-06-23|Lutz Erhartt|Method for generating alternating positive and negative voltage pulses of a transformer primary voltage|DE19624274C1|1996-06-18|1998-03-12|Siemens Ag|Current and voltage supply device for DC voltage network|
    US6731083B2|1998-06-02|2004-05-04|Switched Reluctance Drives, Ltd.|Flux feedback control system|
    US6728118B1|2002-11-13|2004-04-27|Innoveta Technologies, Inc.|Highly efficient, tightly regulated DC-to-DC converter|
    JP2008048513A|2006-08-11|2008-02-28|Toshiba Corp|Semiconductor power conversion control device|
    GB2460266A|2008-05-23|2009-11-25|Cambridge Semiconductor Ltd|Estimating conduction times of a switch mode power supply transformer|CN108964646A|2018-07-17|2018-12-07|武昌首义学院|A kind of edge modulation IGBT/MOS drive system that function is integrated|
    EP3772166A1|2019-07-31|2021-02-03|Lutz Erhartt|Pulse width modulation method for voltage inverter fed transformers|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    AT4342011A|AT511298B1|2011-03-28|2011-03-28|DYNAMIC PWM CONTROL FOR TRANSFORMER-COUPLED COUNTER-TERM INVERTERS|AT4342011A| AT511298B1|2011-03-28|2011-03-28|DYNAMIC PWM CONTROL FOR TRANSFORMER-COUPLED COUNTER-TERM INVERTERS|
    PCT/EP2012/001307| WO2012130426A2|2011-03-28|2012-03-26|Dynamic pwm control for a transformer-coupled push-pull power inverter|
    [返回顶部]